🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."